Celebrating 31 Years of Client Service

Call
Investment technology workflow and reporting review

Consulting

Evaluate a cloud investment management platform

An investment management platform in the cloud can change the application, the hosting environment, or both. Define the change your firm needs before comparing proposals. CSSI can review APX and Axys hosting, portfolio-data migration, custom reports, and the operational handoffs behind a cloud transition.
  • Compare application replacement and hosting changes against the same requirements
  • Preserve history, custom reports, source connections, and client delivery
  • Agree migration, cutover, access, and support responsibilities before rollout

From a CSSI customer engagement

A conversion built around the firm's actual workflows

CSSI's published Axys-to-Orion engagement covers a conversion with sleeve structures, complex billing, and dependent reports. Review the project context when defining what your own system change needs to preserve.

Read the Axys-to-Orion project story

Service fit

Define what moving to the cloud should change

A cloud software platform

A cloud-based investment management platform may provide a new accounting, trading, reporting, or client-service application. Define which existing systems it will replace, the data and reports it must preserve, and the workflows that will move. A subscription still needs configuration, source connections, and acceptance checks.

Managed hosting for an existing application

A firm can also move APX or Axys into a managed environment while retaining its portfolio application. CSSI's cloud-hosting services support that operating model. Assess versions, custom reports, feeds, scheduled jobs, user access, and the support responsibilities around the retained software.

A staged reporting or data change

A wider platform decision may take time while reporting or infrastructure needs attention now. Scope an initial change with clear dependencies and exports. Document how it fits the proposed application transition so the team understands which work can be reused.

Cloud transition checklist

Compare the operating model as well as the application

Use the checklist with the same sample accounts, historical records, report package, and operating day for each proposed approach.

Scroll across to review all three columns.

Compare the operating model as well as the application
RequirementCloud software proposalManaged hosting proposal
Application scopeName the portfolio, trading, reporting, and client-service jobs the new product owns.Name the existing applications, supported versions, and configurations the environment will retain.
Historical recordsValidate conversion, transaction history, tax lots, source figures, and supported exports.Validate database transfer, retained history, software licensing, and access to existing records.
Custom reportsDemonstrate the required layouts and identify redevelopment or unsupported output.Test current report dependencies, SSRS jobs, package preparation, and delivery connections.
Source connectionsConfirm custodian and other source coverage, identifiers, refresh timing, and exception handling.Confirm how existing feeds, file transfers, scheduled jobs, and external connections operate after the move.
Access and continuityReview provider security materials, user roles, recovery terms, and operational responsibilities.Review the managed environment, user access, backups, recovery terms, and responsibilities with the hosting team.
Cutover and ongoing supportAgree conversion acceptance, the first operating close, export access, and product support ownership.Agree migration acceptance, the first operating close, application support, and infrastructure support ownership.

Example decision

An APX firm needs infrastructure relief and better client delivery

Illustrative workflow: an APX firm is considering a new cloud platform because server maintenance consumes staff time and recurring client packages need manual delivery. The current accounting records and custom reports still meet the firm's requirements.
Compare managed APX hosting and a reporting-delivery improvement with a full application transition. Demonstrate the same historical account, custom report, scheduled package, and client access in each path. Identify conversion, redevelopment, feed changes, cutover, and support work before comparing the proposed operating models.

Project outputs

Scope the work around useful deliverables

An application and infrastructure map

Document the retained and replaced systems, their data, reports, schedules, interfaces, and support owners.

A sample migration and reporting comparison

Agree historical records, reports, source checks, access roles, and the first operating close to validate.

A cutover and support scope

Identify implementation responsibilities, acceptance checks, fallback requirements, and recurring support for the chosen approach.

First project

Start with a defined workflow

Name the reason for the change.

Separate infrastructure maintenance, software capability, reporting, data, and operating capacity requirements.

Compare the proposed operating models.

Identify what each application and hosting proposal will replace, retain, and require during implementation.

Validate a representative workflow.

Test history, source records, custom reports, scheduled work, and user access against the firm's approved references.

Agree the transition.

Define data acceptance, cutover, the first close, fallback, and ongoing responsibilities for the work CSSI can support.

Connected services

Choose the support the project needs next

Managed APX hosting

Review a managed environment for the APX application and workflows your firm already uses. Explore APX hosting.

Managed Axys hosting

Assess the infrastructure and support requirements around a retained Axys environment. Explore Axys hosting.

Provider scope

Use current application and hosting descriptions

Ridgeline describes cloud investment software in its investment management platform overview. CSSI describes its managed infrastructure and application support in cloud-hosting services. Use the scope of each approach to prepare comparable requirements.
Confirm the software modules, supported versions, licensing, interfaces, security documentation, recovery terms, and implementation responsibilities with the relevant providers. CSSI should assess its hosting, data, and reporting scope before proposing a transition.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the implementation, workflow, and fit questions that usually come up first.

What is a cloud-based investment management platform?

It is investment software delivered through a cloud environment. Its exact portfolio, accounting, trading, reporting, and client-service scope depends on the product. Identify the jobs it owns and the systems it connects with before choosing it.

Does moving APX or Axys to managed hosting require changing portfolio software?

A managed-hosting project can retain the existing portfolio application. Review versions, licensing, database transfer, custom reports, feeds, schedules, access, and support ownership with CSSI before agreeing the move.

How should we compare a cloud platform with hosted APX?

Use the same sample accounts, history, reports, source records, and operating close. Compare application capabilities and the conversion, configuration, redevelopment, hosting, and recurring support each proposal requires.

What should a cloud transition proposal include?

It should identify retained and replaced systems, migration and validation work, custom report changes, source connections, access roles, cutover, fallback requirements, recovery terms, and ongoing support responsibilities.

Next step

Discuss a defined project with CSSI

Describe the systems you use and the infrastructure, data, or reporting work you need to improve. CSSI can review the hosting and implementation scope before you commit to a cloud transition.